首页> 外文OA文献 >Satisfaction and quality of life with palatal positioned implants in severely atrophic maxillae versus conventional implants supporting fixed full-arch prostheses
【2h】

Satisfaction and quality of life with palatal positioned implants in severely atrophic maxillae versus conventional implants supporting fixed full-arch prostheses

机译:重度萎缩性上颌骨pa骨定位种植体与支持固定全弓假体的传统种植体的满意度和生活质量

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: To evaluate satisfaction and quality of life in patients with palatal positioned implants supporting fixed full-arch prostheses to rehabilitate edentulous maxillae with horizontal atrophy and compare them with conventional well-centered implants placed in non-atrophic supporting fixed full-arch prostheses.Material and Methods: A clinical retrospective study was performed of patients that were rehabilitated with full-arch fixed implant-supported maxillary prostheses and had a minimum follow-up of 5 years after implant loading. Patients were divided into 2 groups: patients with class IV maxilla according to Cawood and Howell and treated with palatal positioned implants (test) and with class III maxilla and treated with implants well-centered in the alveolar ridge and completely surrounded by bone (control). Ten-cm visual analogue scales (VAS) (range 1-10) and the OHIP-14 (Oral Health Impact Profile) questionnaire were used respectively to estimate patient satisfaction and quality of life after implant therapy. Statistical analysis was performed applying Mann-Whitney Test using alpha set at 0.05.Results: Mean global and specific satisfaction – except for self-esteem – were superior for the test group than the control group, although differences were not statistically significant. Regarding quality of life, the reported incidence of problems was lower in the test group for all the studied ítems except for ‘problems at work’. However, differences were not statistically significant in any case.Conclusions: Despite the limitations of the study (retrospective and nonrandomized design) the results suggest that the prosthesis design needed to rehabilitate palatally positioned implants (more coverage of palate) does not lead to lower satisfaction and quality of life of patients, compared to patients treated with implants placed centered and conventional design prostheses that do not cover the palate
机译:背景:为了评估in骨固定式支持全足弓假体的to骨定位植入物的患者的满意度和生活质量,以使水平无牙颌的无牙颌上颌骨康复,并将其与放置在非萎缩性固定式全足弓假体中的常规中心良好的种植体进行比较。方法:对使用全牙弓固定式种植体支持的上颌假体修复的患者进行了临床回顾性研究,并在植入负荷后至少进行了5年的随访。将患者分为两组:根据Cawood和Howell的方法,将IV级上颌骨患者进行and骨定位植入物治疗(测试),将III级上颌骨患者进行治疗,将其很好地定位在牙槽中心并完全被骨包围(对照) 。分别使用10厘米视觉模拟量表(VAS)(范围1-10)和OHIP-14(口腔健康影响曲线)问卷来评估植入治疗后的患者满意度和生活质量。使用Mann-Whitney检验,将alpha设置为0.05,进行了统计分析。结果:测试组的总体和特定满意度(除自尊外)均优于对照组,尽管差异无统计学意义。关于生活质量,除“工作中的问题”外,在所有研究过的项目中,测试组报告的问题发生率均较低。结论:尽管这项研究存在局限性(回顾性和非随机设计),但结果表明,修复design骨定位种植体(更多的coverage骨覆盖)所需的假体设计不会降低满意度。与使用居中放置的植入物和常规设计假体掩盖的患者相比,患者的生活质量和生活质量

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号